Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Use of "long" in incremental sort code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Use of "long" in incremental sort code
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvq5v7hS-Cnb9nYagDkBFTSv1ifFch_-3uCNX0rSD9FnCg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Use of "long" in incremental sort code  (James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sat, 1 Aug 2020 at 02:02, James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd previously attached a patch [1], and there seemed to be agreement
> it was reasonable (lightly so, but I also didn't see any
> disagreement); would someone be able to either commit the change or
> provide some additional feedback?

It looks fine to me. Pushed.

David

> [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAaqYe_Y5zwCTFCJeso7p34yJgf4khR8EaKeJtGd%3DQPudOad6A%40mail.gmail.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Comment simplehash/dynahash trade-offs
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: display offset along with block number in vacuum errors