Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Use of "long" in incremental sort code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From James Coleman
Subject Re: Use of "long" in incremental sort code
Date
Msg-id CAAaqYe9b+GxnoCf+5DRbtSk898vtFYzpxciBt6V8kkcZ0yA7Kg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Use of "long" in incremental sort code  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Use of "long" in incremental sort code  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:12 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 07:47, James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Patch using int64 attached.
>
> I added this to the open items list for PG13.
>
> David

I'd previously attached a patch [1], and there seemed to be agreement
it was reasonable (lightly so, but I also didn't see any
disagreement); would someone be able to either commit the change or
provide some additional feedback?

Thanks,
James

[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAaqYe_Y5zwCTFCJeso7p34yJgf4khR8EaKeJtGd%3DQPudOad6A%40mail.gmail.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is pq_begintypsend so slow?