Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvpaZNSHZOb16W2A4Tn_uED+x3UnNE7NGKx5zLJhQ0YXog@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 at 16:57, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 12:03 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> > -Most operations on EquivalenceClasses should ignore child members.
> > +Most operations on EquivalenceClasses needn't look at child members.
> >
> > Would that be ok?
>
> Yeah, I think that wording works well. It avoids sounding too strict
> but still points things in the right direction.

Thanks. Pushed.

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible api miuse bms_next_member