Re: Comment simplehash/dynahash trade-offs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 11:36, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, with the current users, we'd stand to lose more than we'd gain
> from doing it that way.

FWIW, I'd be ok with just:

- *       The element type is required to contain a "uint32 status" member.
+ *       The element type is required to contain an integer-based
"status" member
+ *       which can store the range of values defined in the SH_STATUS enum.

David