On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 11:42 AM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 11:36, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So, with the current users, we'd stand to lose more than we'd gain
> > from doing it that way.
>
> FWIW, I'd be ok with just:
>
> - * The element type is required to contain a "uint32 status" member.
> + * The element type is required to contain an integer-based
> "status" member
> + * which can store the range of values defined in the SH_STATUS enum.
Thanks for the correction. Pushed.
