Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Why is DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST so insanely low? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Why is DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST so insanely low?
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvpTdor8FufTQoEh0ByCFX+Dm9==BmU7M_xQG0_vADnKTA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why is DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST so insanely low?  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Why is DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST so insanely low?
Re: Why is DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST so insanely low?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 11:16, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd be happy if anyone else would like to try the same experiment to
> see if there's some other value of DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST that might
> suit better.

No takers on the additional testing so I've pushed the patch that
increases it to 0.2.

David

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: add log messages when replication slots become active and inactive (was Re: Is it worth adding ReplicationSlot active_pid to ReplicationSlotPersistentData?)