Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Why is DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST so insanely low? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Why is DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST so insanely low?
Date
Msg-id ZUMKJkk1oD-IhfEX@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why is DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST so insanely low?  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Nov  2, 2023 at 02:32:44PM +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 11:16, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'd be happy if anyone else would like to try the same experiment to
> > see if there's some other value of DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST that might
> > suit better.
> 
> No takers on the additional testing so I've pushed the patch that
> increases it to 0.2.

Great!  Thanks.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Xing Guo
Date:
Subject: Re: Don't pass NULL pointer to strcmp().
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Don't pass NULL pointer to strcmp().