Re: Shave a few cycles off our ilog10 implementation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Shave a few cycles off our ilog10 implementation
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvotNJFcEK+ramHfKsPxC6K1enE8NB3dOFUVzekzD_pwCw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Shave a few cycles off our ilog10 implementation  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 at 09:02, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> This testing was basically just sending a bunch of appropriately sized
> pseudo-random uints in a previously created array sent through a tight
> loop that called the ilog10s and getting average execution times.
>
> Any suggestions for more thorough testing would be welcome.

Maybe something similar to what I did in [1].

David

[1] https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvopR=yPgNr4AbbN4HMOztuyVa+iFYRTvu49pxg9YO_tKw@mail.gmail.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Shave a few cycles off our ilog10 implementation
Next
From: Raghuveer Devulapalli
Date:
Subject: Re: Popcount optimization using AVX512