On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 at 12:42, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> > I've adjusted the patch to use the wording proposed by Alvaro. See attached.
>
> Should we also change the adjacent item to "columns in a table",
> for consistency of wording? Not sure though, because s/per/in a/
> throughout the list doesn't seem like it'd be an improvement.
I might agree if there weren't so many other "per"s in the list.
Maybe "columns per result set" would have been a better title for consistency.
David
