Re: PostgreSQL Limits: maximum number of columns in SELECT result - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PostgreSQL Limits: maximum number of columns in SELECT result
Date
Msg-id 379461.1654044929@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL Limits: maximum number of columns in SELECT result  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> Maybe "columns per result set" would have been a better title for consistency.

I can't quite put my finger on why, but that wording seems odd to me,
even though "columns per table" is natural enough.  "In a" reads much
better here IMO.  Anyway, I see you committed it that way, and it's
certainly not worth the effort to change further.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Limits: maximum number of columns in SELECT result
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply