Thanks for looking into this!
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 6:15 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> FWIW the patch still accepts an incorrect parameter '1abc'
> by ignoring any trailing garbage.
Indeed, fixed.
>
> In any case, I reckon the error message should be more specific. In
> other words, it would be better if it suggests the expected input
> format and range.
+1.
Not a range, actually, because upper limits have no sense for a user.
>
> Regarding the second patch, if we want \watch to throw an error
> message for the garbage trailing to sleep times, I think we should do
> the same for iteration counts.
+1, done.
> Additionally, we need to update the
> documentation.
Done.
Thanks for the review!
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
