> Is s1 a cascading standby of s2? If otherwise s1 and s2 is the standbys of > the primary server respectively, it is not surprising that s2 has progressed > far than s1 when the primary fails. I believe that this is the case you should > use pg_rewind. Even if flushedUpto is reset as proposed in your patch, s2 might > already have applied a WAL record that s1 has not processed yet, and there > would be no gurantee that subsecuent applys suceed.
Thank you for your response. In my scenario, s1 and s2 is the standbys of the primary server respectively, and s1 a synchronous standby and s2 is an asynchronous standby. You mentioned that if s2's replay progress is ahead of s1, pg_rewind should be used. However, what I'm trying to address is an issue where s2 crashes during replay after s1 has been promoted to primary, even though s2's progress hasn't surpassed s1.
