Re: Should we add crc32 in libpgport? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Farina
Subject Re: Should we add crc32 in libpgport?
Date
Msg-id CAAZKuFZh7h3xsrFYb+3NJ6QOQHHNbTz5k1Ha-0MYsaRs54Yxqw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we add crc32 in libpgport?  (Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: Should we add crc32 in libpgport?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com> wrote:
> Thoughts?

Thinking unnecessary.  Motion is progress.  Here is a patch that uses
this exact plan: pgport for the tables, broken out into a header file
that is included in the building of libpgport.  I have confirmed by
objdump -t that multiple copies of the table are not included in the
postgres binary and the bloat has not occurred.

The patch has a detailed cover letter, as per the previous submissions.

--
fdr

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results