Re: Should we add crc32 in libpgport? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Should we add crc32 in libpgport?
Date
Msg-id 17778.1330476905@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we add crc32 in libpgport?  (Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com> writes:
> Thinking unnecessary.  Motion is progress.  Here is a patch that uses
> this exact plan: pgport for the tables, broken out into a header file
> that is included in the building of libpgport.  I have confirmed by
> objdump -t that multiple copies of the table are not included in the
> postgres binary and the bloat has not occurred.

Applied with minor adjustments; mainly, I cleaned up some additional
traces of the old way of building pg_resetxlog and pg_controldata.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Parameterized-path cost comparisons need some work
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: 3rd Cluster Hackers Summit, May 15th in Ottawa