Re: [PATCH] Honor PG_TEST_NOCLEAN for tempdirs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jacob Champion
Subject Re: [PATCH] Honor PG_TEST_NOCLEAN for tempdirs
Date
Msg-id CAAWbhmhb1RET_KGnrVMrg2AgscOCNZeYPgDdRJ7VXx4gw6bNxw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Honor PG_TEST_NOCLEAN for tempdirs  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Honor PG_TEST_NOCLEAN for tempdirs  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 5:41 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> Agreed.  I am not sure that this is worth changing to have
> boolean-like checks.  Hence, I would also to keep the patch that
> checks if the environment variable is defined to enforce the behavior,
> without checking for a specific value.

Sounds good -- 0002 can be ignored as needed, then. (Or I can resend a
v3 for CI purposes, if you'd like.)

--Jacob



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: ReadRecentBuffer() doesn't scale well
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_decode_message vs skip_empty_xacts and xact_wrote_changes