Re: [PATCH] Honor PG_TEST_NOCLEAN for tempdirs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [PATCH] Honor PG_TEST_NOCLEAN for tempdirs
Date
Msg-id ZJ5/j9AwWZGyPiGU@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Honor PG_TEST_NOCLEAN for tempdirs  (Jacob Champion <jchampion@timescale.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Honor PG_TEST_NOCLEAN for tempdirs
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 09:05:59AM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> Sounds good -- 0002 can be ignored as needed, then. (Or I can resend a
> v3 for CI purposes, if you'd like.)

I am assuming that this is 0001 posted here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/8be3d35a-9608-b1d5-e5e6-7a744ea45fef@timescale.com

And that looks OK to me.  This is something I'd rather backpatch down
to v11 on usability ground for developers.  Any comments or objections
about that?
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: shveta malik
Date:
Subject: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Fix search_path to a safe value during maintenance operations.