On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 09:05:59AM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> Sounds good -- 0002 can be ignored as needed, then. (Or I can resend a
> v3 for CI purposes, if you'd like.)
I am assuming that this is 0001 posted here:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/8be3d35a-9608-b1d5-e5e6-7a744ea45fef@timescale.com
And that looks OK to me. This is something I'd rather backpatch down
to v11 on usability ground for developers. Any comments or objections
about that?
--
Michael
