Re: Upgrade 96 -> 11 - Mailing list pgsql-general
| From | James Sewell |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Upgrade 96 -> 11 |
| Date | |
| Msg-id | CAANVwEvJUii=L_KOTARqt9BKcFoY2TXsghEP4qonTi7+Qd00fw@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
| In response to | Re: Upgrade 96 -> 11 (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>) |
| List | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 07:55, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
On 9/2/19 2:45 PM, James Sewell wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 7:41 am, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
> <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>> wrote:
>
> On 9/2/19 2:20 PM, James Sewell wrote:
>
> >
> > So this is a separate cluster from the one you used
> pg_upgrade on?
> >
> >
> > In that case yes it was seperate
> >
> >
> >
> > In other words when doing pg_upgrade you could not get a working
> > cluster, correct?
> >
> >
> > Pg_upgrade does not complete - but as it hasn’t started migrating
> data I
> > can start it and it’s fine (except for postgis which is now in a
> partial
> > install state)
>
> Now I will actually respond to list:)
>
> So from your original post:
>
> 1) "The tablename table gets created causing the above error"
>
> Is 'tablename' a user table or part of PostGIS?
>
>
> The tablename table is a user table, spatial_ref_sys is a postgis table.
I am going to assume then that it has to do with this:
"LINE 39: "location_pt" "public"."geography"(Point,4283), "
What is the above pointing to?
This needs the PostGIS types and tables to work - they don't exist as they were not created with CREATE EXTENSION, but rather are to be created later in the restore.
>
> 2) "Both the versions have PostGIS 2.5.1 installed and working"
>
> How do you know it is working on the 11 version?
>
>
> By version I mean 11 - I can init a new cluster and it’s fine
>
> The more I look at this it seems like:
>
> A) pg_upgrade somehow creates postgis without supporting tables
So you see a CREATE EXTENSION postgis?
Is there anything in the logs that pertains to the above?
Yes and no. Just the create extension.
> B) while the tables would be created from the schema dump files, they
> happen too late
What happens if you use pg_dump from version 11 against the 9.6 cluster
with the -s and -p?
Does it shows the schema creation in the order you need?
Yes. It's only in the binary_upgrade mode I see issues (because the extension stuff isn't created with CREATE EXTENSION)
>
>
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian.klaver@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
>
> --
> James Sewell,
> Chief Architect
>
> Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf, 26-32 Pirrama Road, Pyrmont NSW 2009
> P (+61) 2 8099 9000 W www.jirotech.com
> <http://www.jirotech.com> F (+61) 2 8099 9099
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The contents of this email are confidential and may be subject to legal
> or professional privilege and copyright. No representation is made that
> this email is free of viruses or other defects. If you have received
> this communication in error, you may not copy or distribute any part of
> it or otherwise disclose its contents to anyone. Please advise the
> sender of your incorrect receipt of this correspondence.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
The contents of this email are confidential and may be subject to legal or professional privilege and copyright. No representation is made that this email is free of viruses or other defects. If you have received this communication in error, you may not copy or distribute any part of it or otherwise disclose its contents to anyone. Please advise the sender of your incorrect receipt of this correspondence.
pgsql-general by date: