Re: Upgrade 96 -> 11 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From James Sewell
Subject Re: Upgrade 96 -> 11
Date
Msg-id CAANVwEs+H2Po3xArSLzLUiFWn4FbTqS5U0xv5KLyu7m3XOG5Tw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Upgrade 96 -> 11  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
List pgsql-general


On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 7:41 am, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
On 9/2/19 2:20 PM, James Sewell wrote:

>
>     So this is a separate cluster from the one you used pg_upgrade on?
>
>
> In that case yes it was seperate
>
>
>
>     In other words when doing pg_upgrade you could not get a working
>     cluster, correct?
>
>
> Pg_upgrade does not complete - but as it hasn’t started migrating data I
> can start it and it’s fine (except for postgis which is now in a partial
> install state)

Now I will actually respond to list:)

So from your original post:

1) "The tablename table gets created causing the above error"

Is 'tablename' a user table or part of PostGIS?


The tablename table is a user table, spatial_ref_sys is a postgis table. 

2) "Both the versions have PostGIS 2.5.1 installed and working"

How do you know it is working on the 11 version?

By version I mean 11 - I can init a new cluster and it’s fine

The more I look at this it seems like:

A) pg_upgrade somehow creates postgis without supporting tables
B) while the tables would be created from the schema dump files, they happen too late




>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     --

> James Sewell,
> Chief Architect

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
--
James Sewell,
Chief Architect

Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf, 26-32 Pirrama Road, Pyrmont NSW 2009
P (+61) 2 8099 9000  W www.jirotech.com  F (+61) 2 8099 9099


The contents of this email are confidential and may be subject to legal or professional privilege and copyright. No representation is made that this email is free of viruses or other defects. If you have received this communication in error, you may not copy or distribute any part of it or otherwise disclose its contents to anyone. Please advise the sender of your incorrect receipt of this correspondence.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Upgrade 96 -> 11
Next
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Upgrade 96 -> 11