On Sun, Jul 7, 2024 at 10:49 AM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 05:36:25PM -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> > I've attached a WIP v11 streaming vacuum patch set here that is
> > rebased over master (by Thomas), so that I could add a CF entry for
> > it. It still has the problem with the extra WAL write and fsync calls
> > investigated by Thomas above. Thomas has some work in progress doing
> > streaming write-behind to alleviate the issues with the buffer access
> > strategy and streaming reads. When he gets a version of that ready to
> > share, he will start a new "Streaming Vacuum" thread.
>
> To avoid reviewing the wrong patch, I'm writing to verify the status here.
> This is Needs Review in the commitfest. I think one of these two holds:
>
> 1. Needs Review is valid.
> 2. It's actually Waiting on Author. You're commissioning a review of the
> future-thread patch, not this one.
>
> If it's (1), given the WIP marking, what is the scope of the review you seek?
> I'm guessing performance is out of scope; what else is in or out of scope?
Ah, you're right. I moved it to "Waiting on Author" as we are waiting
on Thomas' version which has a fix for the extra WAL write/sync
behavior.
Sorry for the "Needs Review" noise!
- Melanie
