Re: Confine vacuum skip logic to lazy_scan_skip - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: Confine vacuum skip logic to lazy_scan_skip
Date
Msg-id 20240707144944.58.nmisch@google.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Confine vacuum skip logic to lazy_scan_skip  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Confine vacuum skip logic to lazy_scan_skip
Re: Confine vacuum skip logic to lazy_scan_skip
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 05:36:25PM -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> I've attached a WIP v11 streaming vacuum patch set here that is
> rebased over master (by Thomas), so that I could add a CF entry for
> it. It still has the problem with the extra WAL write and fsync calls
> investigated by Thomas above. Thomas has some work in progress doing
> streaming write-behind to alleviate the issues with the buffer access
> strategy and streaming reads. When he gets a version of that ready to
> share, he will start a new "Streaming Vacuum" thread.

To avoid reviewing the wrong patch, I'm writing to verify the status here.
This is Needs Review in the commitfest.  I think one of these two holds:

1. Needs Review is valid.
2. It's actually Waiting on Author.  You're commissioning a review of the
   future-thread patch, not this one.

If it's (1), given the WIP marking, what is the scope of the review you seek?
I'm guessing performance is out of scope; what else is in or out of scope?



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joel Jacobson"
Date:
Subject: Re: Incorrect results from numeric round() and trunc()
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: pg_maintain and USAGE privilege on schema