On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 12:10 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry for the bug.
>
> At Thu, 25 Mar 2021 01:50:29 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote in
> > Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com> writes:
> > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 8:09 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > >> static inline struct SMgrRelationData *
> > >> RelationGetSmgr(Relation rel)
> > >> {
> > >> if (unlikely(rel->rd_smgr == NULL))
> > >> RelationOpenSmgr(rel);
> > >> return rel->rd_smgr;
> > >> }
> >
> > > A quick question: Can't it be a macro instead of an inline function
> > > like other macros we have in rel.h?
> >
> > The multiple-evaluation hazard seems like an issue. We've tolerated
> > such hazards in the past, but mostly just because we weren't relying
> > on static inlines being available, so there wasn't a good way around
> > it.
> >
> > Also, the conditional evaluation here would look rather ugly
> > in a macro, I think, if indeed you could do it at all without
> > provoking compiler warnings.
>
> FWIW, +1 for the function as is.
>
Ok, in the attached patch, I have added the inline function to rel.h, and for
that, I end up including smgr.h to rel.h. I tried to replace all rel->rd_smgr
by RelationGetSmgr() function and removed the RelationOpenSmgr() call from
the nearby to it which I don't think needed at all.
Regards,
Amul
