2015-08-10 2:23 GMT+09:00 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> I'm not too excited about supporting the use case where there are two
>> people using queryId but it just so happens that they always set
>> exactly the same value. That seems like a weird setup. Wouldn't that
>> mean both modules were applying the same jumble algorithm, and
>> therefore you're doing the work of computing the jumble twice per
>> query?
>
> Not only that, but you'd need to keep the two modules in sync, which
> would be one of the greatest recipes for bugs we've thought of yet.
>
> If there's actually a use case for that sort of thing, I would vote
> for moving the jumble-calculation code into core and making both of
> the interested extensions do
>
> /* Calculate query hash if it's not been done yet */
> if (query->queryId == 0)
> calculate_query_hash(query);
I vote for this too.
Jumble-calculation is the smartest way to identify query groups,
so several modules can take advantages of it if in the core.
Regards,
--
Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga@uptime.jp>
