Re: ALTER SYSTEM RESET? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: ALTER SYSTEM RESET?
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1LvqBfNdoGO4YUZMOgcHg7Mi_9oVD2B5XJPtU_KTXLdew@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ALTER SYSTEM RESET?  (Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com>)
Responses Re: ALTER SYSTEM RESET?  (Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com> wrote:
> On 06/26/2014 05:07 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > I think it will make sense if we support RESET ALL as well similar
> > to Alter Database .. RESET ALL syntax.  Do you see any reason
> > why we shouldn't support RESET ALL syntax for Alter System?
>
> Yes, that makes sense.  I've added that in the attached version 2 of the
> patch.

I think the idea used in patch to implement RESET ALL is sane.  In passing
by, I noticed that modified lines in .sgml have crossed 80 char boundary which
is generally preferred to be maintained..

Refer below modification.

!    values to the <filename>postgresql.auto.conf</filename> file. Setting the parameter to
!    <literal>DEFAULT</literal>, or using the <command>RESET</command> variant, removes the configuration entry from


With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql.auto.conf and reload
Next
From: Ryan Johnson
Date:
Subject: Index-only scans and non-MVCC snapshots