Re: ALTER SYSTEM RESET? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vik Fearing
Subject Re: ALTER SYSTEM RESET?
Date
Msg-id 53AD13F5.1020701@dalibo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ALTER SYSTEM RESET?  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: ALTER SYSTEM RESET?  (Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 06/27/2014 06:22 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com
> <mailto:vik.fearing@dalibo.com>> wrote:
>> On 06/26/2014 05:07 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> > I think it will make sense if we support RESET ALL as well similar
>> > to Alter Database .. RESET ALL syntax.  Do you see any reason
>> > why we shouldn't support RESET ALL syntax for Alter System?
>>
>> Yes, that makes sense.  I've added that in the attached version 2 of the
>> patch.
>
> I think the idea used in patch to implement RESET ALL is sane.  In passing
> by, I noticed that modified lines in .sgml have crossed 80 char
> boundary which
> is generally preferred to be maintained..
>
> Refer below modification.
>
> !    values to the <filename>postgresql.auto.conf</filename> file.
> Setting the parameter to
> !    <literal>DEFAULT</literal>, or using the <command>RESET</command>
> variant, removes the configuration entry from

I did that on purpose so that it's easy for a reviewer/committer to see
what changed.

This third patch reformats the documentation in the way I expected it to
be committed.
--
Vik

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: review: Built-in binning functions
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: proposal: new long psql parameter --on-error-stop]