On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 11:22 PM Jacob Champion <jchampion@timescale.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 9:45 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > There are a bunch of moving parts and hidden subtleties here, and I fell
> > > into a few traps when I was working on my patch, so it'd be nice to have
> > > additional coverage. I'm happy to contribute effort in that area if it's
> > > helpful.
> >
> > I think it depends on what tests you have in mind.
>
> Just the ones I mentioned, to start with.
>
> > I suggest you can
> > propose a patch to cover tests for this are in a separate thread. We
> > can then evaluate those separately.
>
> To confirm -- you want me to start a new thread for tests for this
> patchset? (Tests written against HEAD would likely be obsoleted by
> this change.)
>
If the tests you have in mind are only related to this patch set then
feel free to propose them here if you feel the current ones are not
sufficient. I just want to be cautious that we shouldn't spend too
much time adding additional tests which are related to the base
functionality as we have left with less time for the last CF and I
would like to push the change for HEAD before that.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
