On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 9:45 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > There are a bunch of moving parts and hidden subtleties here, and I fell
> > into a few traps when I was working on my patch, so it'd be nice to have
> > additional coverage. I'm happy to contribute effort in that area if it's
> > helpful.
>
> I think it depends on what tests you have in mind.
Just the ones I mentioned, to start with.
> I suggest you can
> propose a patch to cover tests for this are in a separate thread. We
> can then evaluate those separately.
To confirm -- you want me to start a new thread for tests for this
patchset? (Tests written against HEAD would likely be obsoleted by
this change.)
--Jacob