Re: [DESIGN] ParallelAppend - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: [DESIGN] ParallelAppend
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1LTaPfpCW2V=3k7XrLsLNKUVY9H0c_CMaO1aR=QkyB6hw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [DESIGN] ParallelAppend  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> -
> Is the main reason to have add_partial_path() is that it has some
> less checks or is it that current add_path will give wrong answers
> in any case?
>
> If there is no case where add_path can't work, then there is some
> advanatge in retaining add_path() atleast in terms of maintining
> the code.

To be specific, I mean to say about the logic of add_path().


With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: konstantin knizhnik
Date:
Subject: Selective logical replication
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Selective logical replication