On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 3:00 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 2:02 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I don't think walsenders fetching segment from archive is totally
> > stupid. With that feature, we can use fast and expensive but small
> > storage for pg_wal, while avoiding replciation from dying even in
> > emergency.
>
> It seems like a useful feature to have at least as an option and it
> saves a lot of work - failovers, expensive rebuilds of
> standbys/subscribers, manual interventions etc.
>
> If you're saying that even the walsedners serving logical replication
> subscribers would go fetch from the archive location for the removed
> WAL files, it mandates enabling archiving on the subscribers.
>
Why archiving on subscribers is required? Won't it be sufficient if
that is enabled on the publisher where we have walsender?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
