On Sun, 06 Nov 2022 12:54:17 -0500
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> writes:
> >> The attached patch tries to add comments explaining it on the functions.
>
> > I forward it to the hackers list because the patch is to fix comments.
>
> What do you think of the attached wording?
It looks good to me. That describes the expected behaviour exactly.
> I don't think the pipeline angle is of concern to anyone who might be
> reading these comments with the aim of understanding what guarantees
> they have. Perhaps there should be more about that in the user-facing
> docs, though.
I agree with that we don't need to mention pipelining in these comments,
and that we need more in the documentation. I attached a doc patch to add
a mention of commands that do internal commit to the pipelining section.
Also, this adds a reference for the pipelining protocol to the libpq doc.
Regards,
Yugo Nagata
--
Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
