On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:23 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Also, looking at the patch, it doesn't look like it take enough care
> to build execution state of new worker so that it can participate in a
> running query. I may be wrong, but the execution state initialization
> routines are written with the assumption that all the workers start
> simultaneously?
>
No such assumptions, workers started later can also join the execution
of the query.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
