On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 4:20 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Don't do that. Quite aside from the inconsistency, this is pretty
> darn unsafe coding technique, because there is exactly nothing
> guaranteeing that the caller passes a buffer of the length the
> function expects.
>
> I'm not real sure that you could expect a compiler warning for that
> even if you'd put the length declaration where callers could see it.
> So personally I'd avoid hard-wiring NAMEDATALEN into this API at all,
> and have the caller pass sizeof(its buffer) instead.
>
Thanks for pointing it out. I'll look into this. BTW, how one can
check such reports, do one need to check all make logs for buildfarm
members?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.