Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1KcmS687K066HKSHhXUKY3MywLEq2WJwsqZpaB8ZLVQ-Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply  ("houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>)
Responses RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply  ("houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 3:43 PM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com
<houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> while reading the code, I noticed that in pa_send_data() we set wait event
> to WAIT_EVENT_LOGICAL_PARALLEL_APPLY_STATE_CHANGE while sending the
> message to the queue. Because this state is used in multiple places, user might
> not be able to distinguish what they are waiting for. So It seems we'd better
> to use WAIT_EVENT_MQ_SEND here which will be eaier to distinguish and
> understand. Here is a tiny patch for that.
>

Thanks for noticing this. The patch LGTM. I'll push this in some time.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Richard Guo
Date:
Subject: A problem in deconstruct_distribute_oj_quals
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: tests against running server occasionally fail, postgres_fdw & tenk1