Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1KRywFoqbA5C1oQM7+LqabD8PT=fACdnY6_qDi+hG1KvQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 8:40 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> At Mon, 24 Apr 2023 11:50:37 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote in
> > In my opinion, it is fine to replace the Assert with an ERROR.
>
> Sorry for posting multiple times in a row, but I'm a bit unceratin
> whether we should use FATAL or ERROR for this situation. The stream is
> not provided by user, and the session or process cannot continue.
>

I think ERROR should be fine here similar to other cases in worker.c.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Autogenerate some wait events code and documentation
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs