On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 3:24 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> Regarding the second failure, which was reported the upstream.
>
> While reading some other threads, I found that the similar phenomenon has already
> been reported in [1]. The primal reason was that slots reused the serialized
> snapshot but it was not correct. Therefore, I thought the second failure should
> be discussed on the referred thread and here we should focused on the recently
> proposed fix by me.
> (This meant that my proposed workload may not work well after the fix. Will modify
> the test later if needed.)
>
I agree with this. Is there a reason you are not using the test for
the issue originally reported in this thread?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
