Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1Jze_9pO9Nd9WUeBVEUbKL4yjVcrSS9u5KYizTHPZ_+Ag@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> In terms of this project overall, NumLWLocks() now knows about only
> four categories of stuff: fixed lwlocks, backend locks (proc.c),
> replication slot locks, and locks needed by extensions.  I think it'd
> probably be fine to move the backend locks into PGPROC directly, and
> the replication slot locks into ReplicationSlot.
>

IIdus has written a patch to move backend locks into PGPROC which
I am reviewing and will do performance tests once he responds to
my review comments and I have written a patch to move replication
slot locks into ReplicationSlot which is attached with this mail.



With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: pg_controldata/pg_resetxlog "Latest checkpoint's NextXID" format
Next
From: Shay Rojansky
Date:
Subject: Re: Some 9.5beta2 backend processes not terminating properly?