Re: Test failures of 100_bugs.pl - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Test failures of 100_bugs.pl
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1Jz876y92377VdL854XzbTAVuTG5FDEYim7sMZynk4fSA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Test failures of 100_bugs.pl  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses RE: Test failures of 100_bugs.pl
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 8:53 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> cfbot, the buildfarm and locally I have seen 100_bugs.pl fail
> occasionally. Just rarely enough that I never got around to looking into it
> for real.
>
...
>
> We see t2 added to the publication:
> 2023-01-24 00:57:30.099 UTC [73654][client backend] [100_bugs.pl][7/5:0] LOG:  statement: ALTER PUBLICATION testpub
ADDTABLE t2
 
>
> And that *then* "t" was synchronized:
> 2023-01-24 00:57:30.102 UTC [73640][logical replication worker] LOG:  logical replication table synchronization
workerfor subscription "testsub", table "t" has finished
 
>
> and then that the refresh was issued:
> 2023-01-24 00:57:30.128 UTC [73657][client backend] [100_bugs.pl][5/10:0] LOG:  statement: ALTER SUBSCRIPTION testsub
REFRESHPUBLICATION
 
>
> And we see a walsender starting and the query to get the new tables being executed:
> 2023-01-24 00:57:30.139 UTC [73660][walsender] [testsub][6/8:0] LOG:  statement: SELECT DISTINCT t.schemaname,
t.tablename
>         , t.attnames
>         FROM pg_catalog.pg_publication_tables t
>          WHERE t.pubname IN ('testpub')
>
>
> And that's it, the rest of the time is just polling.
>
>
> Perhaps wait_for_subscription_sync() should dump the set of rel states to make
> something like this more debuggable?
>
>
> The fact that the synchronization for t finished just before the refresh makes
> me wonder if a wakeup or a cache invalidation got lost?
>

From the LOGs, the only thing one could draw is lost invalidation
because the nap time of the apply worker is 1s, so it should process
invalidation during the time we are polling. Also, the rel should be
added to pg_subscription_rel because the test is still polling for
rels to be in 'ready' or 'done' state.

I think we can do three things to debug (a) as you suggest dump the
rel state in wait_for_subscription_sync; (b) add some DEBUG log in
invalidate_syncing_table_states() to ensure that invalidation has been
processed; (c) print rel states and relids from table_states_not_ready
in process_syncing_tables_for_apply() to see if t2 has ever appeared
in that list.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15 (typo)
Next
From: Jelte Fennema
Date:
Subject: Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner