Re: Parallel Index Scan vs BTP_DELETED and BTP_HALF_DEAD - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Parallel Index Scan vs BTP_DELETED and BTP_HALF_DEAD
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1Jfo71xtJ7TtyWAYZoWCr_AOcKqcfs2AUVTsj64j3bxyg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel Index Scan vs BTP_DELETED and BTP_HALF_DEAD  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 2:51 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 12:35 AM, Kuntal Ghosh
> <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've also verified the backward scan case with the query provided by
>> Thomas. In standby,
>> 2. explain analyze select * from t1 where a+1>a order by a desc; and
>> the parallel workers hang.
>> The patch fixes the issue.
>
> Committed and back-patched to v10.
>

Thanks.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key