Re: Parallel Index Scan vs BTP_DELETED and BTP_HALF_DEAD - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Parallel Index Scan vs BTP_DELETED and BTP_HALF_DEAD
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobHkLty7LL4ADkxf_9xxvqwKtWkbqH+BQ6N9yMCn=4N8A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel Index Scan vs BTP_DELETED and BTP_HALF_DEAD  (Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Parallel Index Scan vs BTP_DELETED and BTP_HALF_DEAD  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 12:35 AM, Kuntal Ghosh
<kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've also verified the backward scan case with the query provided by
> Thomas. In standby,
> 2. explain analyze select * from t1 where a+1>a order by a desc; and
> the parallel workers hang.
> The patch fixes the issue.

Committed and back-patched to v10.

Sorry, Kuntal, I forgot to credit you in the commit message.  :-(

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] parallel.c oblivion of worker-startup failures