On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 7:46 AM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> I think the approach was most conservative one which does not have to change
> the version of the snapshot. However, I understood that you wanted to consider
> the optimized solution for HEAD first.
>
Right, let's see if we can have a solution other than always avoiding
restoring snapshots during slot creation even if that is for just
HEAD.
> > See SnapBuildCommitTxn(). Can we avoid this problem if we
> > would have list of all running xacts when we serialize the snapshot by
> > not decoding any xact whose xid lies in that list? If so, one idea to
> > achieve could be that we maintain the highest_running_xid while
> > serailizing the snapshot and then during restore if that
> > highest_running_xid is <= builder->initial_xmin_horizon, then we
> > ignore restoring the snapshot. We already have few such cases handled
> > in SnapBuildRestore().
>
> Based on the idea, I made a prototype. It can pass tests added by others and me.
> How do other think?
>
Won't it be possible to achieve the same thing if we just save
(serialize) the highest xid among all running xacts?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
