Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Map basebackup tablespaces using a tablespace_map file - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Map basebackup tablespaces using a tablespace_map file
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1+yA6d4EVXt3VWBVJ6hg-yU2Y+Q6qZNYwoVCR4-SAWGmw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Map basebackup tablespaces using a tablespace_map file  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Map basebackup tablespaces using a tablespace_map file  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Map basebackup tablespaces using a tablespace_map file
> >> >
> >> > Windows can't reliably restore symbolic links from a tar format, so
> >> > instead during backup start we create a tablespace_map file, which is
> >> > used by the restoring postgres to create the correct links in pg_tblspc.
> >> > The backup protocol also now has an option to request this file to be
> >> > included in the backup stream, and this is used by pg_basebackup when
> >> > operating in tar mode.
> >> >
> >> > This is done on all platforms, not just Windows.
> >> >
> >> > This means that pg_basebackup will not not work in tar mode against 9.4
> >> > and older servers, as this protocol option isn't implemented there.
> >>
> >> While I was performing the recovery-related tests, I found that there was
> >> the case where $PGDATA/tablespace_map was not renamed to *.old at the
> >> recovery.
> >> Is this harmless and intentional?
> >
> > There shouldn't be any problem because we tablespace_map file
> > only if backup file is present.
> >
> >> Sorry if this has been already
> >> discussed so far.
> >>
> >> The steps to reproduce the problem is:
> >>
> >> 1. start base backup, i.e., call pg_start_backup().
> >> 2. repeat some write transactions and checkpoints until the WAL file
> >> containing
> >>     the checkpoint record that backup_label indicates will be removed.
> >> 3. killall -9 postgres
> >> 4. start the server and a crash recovery.
> >>
> >> At this time, the crash recovery fails with the following error messages.
> >> 2015-06-09 12:26:54 JST FATAL:  could not locate required checkpoint
> >> record
> >> 2015-06-09 12:26:54 JST HINT:  If you are not restoring from a backup,
> >> try removing the file ".../backup_label".
> >>
> >> 5. according to the above hint message, remove $PGDATA/backup_label
> >>     and restart a crash recovery
> >>
> >> Then you can see that tablespace_map remains in $PGDATA after the recovery
> >> ends.
> >>
> >
> > The basic idea is that tablespace_map file will be used in case we
> > have to restore from a backup which contains tablespaces.  So
> > I think if user is manually removing backup_label, there is no
> > meaning of tablespace_map, so that should also be removed. One
> > way to address this is modify the Hint message suggesting that
> > remove tablespace_map if present.
> >
> > Current :
> > If you are not restoring from a backup, try removing the file
> > \"%s/backup_label\
> > Modify it to:
> > If you are not restoring from a backup, try removing the file
> > \"%s/backup_label\
> > and, if present \"%s/tablespace_map\.
>
> Or what about removing tablespace_map file at the beginning of recovery
> whenever backup_label doesn't exist? 

Yes, thats another way, but is it safe to assume that user won't need
that file, I mean in the valid scenario (where both backup_label and
tablespace_map are present and usable) also, we rename them to
*.old rather than deleting it.

Yet another way could be we return error if tablespace_map is
present whenever backup_label doesn't exist?

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Information of pg_stat_ssl visible to all users
Next
From: David Gould
Date:
Subject: Re: [CORE] back-branch multixact fixes & 9.5 alpha/beta: schedule