Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1+mq4oFB7rjytkT3VvSjSdZLeMVmfeJ3-Ps_kQpD10Pdw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 11:12 AM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 2:39 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Here, the test is expecting 2 prepared transactions corresponding to
> > two subscriptions but it waits for just one subscription via
> > appname_copy. It should wait for the second subscription using
> > $appname as well.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> I agree with this analysis. The test needs to wait for both
> subscriptions to catch up.
> Attached is a patch that addresses this issue.
>

LGTM, unless Peter Smith has any comments or thinks otherwise, I'll
push this on Monday.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Replace l337sp34k in comments.
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions