On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Amit, can you please split the buffer manager changes in this patch
>>> into a separate patch?
>>
>> Sure, attached patch extend_bufmgr_api_for_hash_index_v1.patch does that.
>
> The additional argument to ConditionalLockBuffer() doesn't seem to be
> used anywhere in the main patch. Do we actually need it?
>
No, with latest patch of concurrent hash index, we don't need it. I
have forgot to remove it. Please find updated patch attached. The
usage of second parameter for ConditionalLockBuffer() is removed as we
don't want to allow I/O across content locks, so the patch is changed
to fallback to twice locking the metapage.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
