On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 04:30:28PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Not sure what word was missed here, but I guess "count":
>>
>> our the number of buckets stored in our cached copy of the metapage. If
>> -so, the bucket has certainly been split, because the must originally
>> +so, the bucket has certainly been split, because the count must originally
>> have been less than the number of buckets that existed at that time and
>
> I think there's a 2nd typo:
>
> |After computing the ostensibly-correct bucket number based on our cached
> |copy of the metapage, we lock the corresponding primary bucket page and
> |check whether the bucket count stored in hasho_prevblkno is greater than
> |OUR the number of buckets stored in our cached copy of the metapage. If
>
> remove "our"?
>
Both your and Thomas's proposed change looks good to me.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
