On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 12:23:31PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 04:30:28PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Not sure what word was missed here, but I guess "count":
> >>
> >> our the number of buckets stored in our cached copy of the metapage. If
> >> -so, the bucket has certainly been split, because the must originally
> >> +so, the bucket has certainly been split, because the count must originally
> >> have been less than the number of buckets that existed at that time and
> >
> > I think there's a 2nd typo:
> >
> > |After computing the ostensibly-correct bucket number based on our cached
> > |copy of the metapage, we lock the corresponding primary bucket page and
> > |check whether the bucket count stored in hasho_prevblkno is greater than
> > |OUR the number of buckets stored in our cached copy of the metapage. If
> >
> > remove "our"?
> >
>
> Both your and Thomas's proposed change looks good to me.
Fixed in the attached, applied patch.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
