On 16 March 2012 08:45, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On Friday, March 16, 2012 09:30:58 AM Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 16 March 2012 08:13, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> > On Thursday, March 15, 2012 11:41:21 PM Thom Brown wrote:
>> >> Looks like the ctas-on-command-triggers-01.patch patch needs re-basing.
>> >
>> > I can do that - but imo the other patch (not based on the command
>> > triggers stuff) is the relevant for now as this patch ought to be
>> > applied before command triggers. It doesn't seem to make too much sense
>> > to rebase it frequently as long as the command triggers patch isn't
>> > stable...
>> >
>> > Any reason you would prefer it being rebased?
>>
>> Using latest Git master without any additional patches, I can't get it to
>> apply:
>>
>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 16.
>> Hunk #2 succeeded at 22 (offset -1 lines).
>> 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>> src/include/commands/tablecmds.h.rej
> Did you read the paragraph above?
Yes, but I don't think I'm clear on what you mean. Are you saying I
should use ctas-01.patch instead of ctas-on-command-triggers-01.patch?If so, that patch results in me not being able to
applyDimitri's
command triggers patch. And I thought that patch doesn't actually
cause triggers to fire on CTAS?
Thom
