On 3 March 2012 14:26, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
> Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> writes:
>> And having tried building it, it appears to fail.
>
> Sorry about that, my compiler here was happy building the source (and I
> had been doing make clean install along the way) and make installcheck
> passed, here.
>
> Now fixed on my github's branch, including docs.
>
> I'll send an updated patch revision later, hopefully including pg_dump
> support fixtures (well, adaptation to the new way of doing things IIUC)
> and maybe with some trigger arguments rework done.
>
> I understand that you're not blocked until that new version is out,
> right? You could use either the incremental patch attached for
> convenience.
Thanks for the extra patch. Do you see any functional changes between
now and your next patch? If so, it doesn't make sense for me to test
anything yet.
--
Thom
