On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 8:15 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:43 PM Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > > I share your discomfort with the wording. How about: > > > > WAL records must be kept on standby until they are ready to be applied. > > Therefore, longer delays will result in a greater accumulation of WAL files, > > increasing disk space requirements for the standby's <filename>pg_wal</> > > directory. > > Looks awesome.
Here that is in patch form. I feel that the feature freeze should not preclude committing this documentation improvement, but if someone feels otherwise, then I will leave this until the tree reopens.
