On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 at 16:02, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 10:58 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> >> Makes sense. I will do this soon if nobody objects.
> >>
> >> I'm mildly uncomfortable with the phrase "WAL records generated over
> >> the delay period" because it seems a bit imprecise, but I'm not sure
> >> what would be better and I think the meaning is clear.
> >
> > Maybe "during" instead of "over"? But I'm not sure that's the part you're referring to?
>
> Yeah, something like that, maybe.
I share your discomfort with the wording. How about:
WAL records must be kept on standby until they are ready to be applied.
Therefore, longer delays will result in a greater accumulation of WAL files,
increasing disk space requirements for the standby's <filename>pg_wal</>
directory.
--
Thom
