Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobCYMDk-YHjG-br9_YH179enxajM969CTpG4DyFQ=kSPQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery  (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 10:58 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> Makes sense. I will do this soon if nobody objects.
>>
>> I'm mildly uncomfortable with the phrase "WAL records generated over
>> the delay period" because it seems a bit imprecise, but I'm not sure
>> what would be better and I think the meaning is clear.
>
> Maybe "during" instead of "over"? But I'm not sure that's the part you're referring to?

Yeah, something like that, maybe.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow time delayed standbys and recovery
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT