On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 8:41 AM Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > I know it's been 8 years, but I still think it would be a useful note > to add to the docs.
Many points for bringing that one back :)
Makes sense. I will do this soon if nobody objects.
I'm mildly uncomfortable with the phrase "WAL records generated over the delay period" because it seems a bit imprecise, but I'm not sure what would be better and I think the meaning is clear.
Maybe "during" instead of "over"? But I'm not sure that's the part you're referring to?
